Background
Vidrohi Tukaram |
MAN OF THOUGHTS AND ACTION
Rebellion Saint- Tukaram |
Revelation to Tukaram was a Social Revelation, not spiritual
revolution
Tukaram was from a rich family. His family business was
moneylending. Since childhood, he had been seeing helpless people came to his
father for mortgaging and taking loan. Recovering debts to the poor was not the
purpose of his life. On the contrary, he decided to use his power to
fight those who denied the poor the right to live with dignity for
generations. He went outside to Bhanmnath Moutain and sat there in
meditation for 7 days. After spending seven days meditating on the
mountain of social consciousness, Tukaram had some special revelation about
life. As a direct result of this revelation, he drowned the loan
documents debtor in the river of Indrayani before stepping into the house
again. It was not a religious or spiritual revelation but it was a
social revelation. This meant that the enlightenment that took place was not of
a mysterious, profound spiritual nature, but of a genuine philosophy of life
through the keen and benevolent observation of the social situation. Debt
settlement is one of the rarest events in human history. It is not
uncommon for one to lose one's own wealth, integrity or authority, with very
few people whose moral consciousness is highly developed, whose conscience is
very stable and whose concept of humanity is very high. Tukaram was
one of such free people, the maturity of his extraordinary conduct and thoughts
was shown by Tukaram. For about two hundred years before Marx, Tukaram
had become less immersed in his class interests, had been declassified.
Revolutionary Revelation was either misinterpreted or neglected
It a
revolutionary incident but highly neglected the essence of incidents by
scholars. Instead of it was corruptly presenting this incident from a different
angle. It was described as Tukaram was not practical enough and just for
emotion's sake, he sacrificed his business. Such interpretation was an attempt
to diminish the importance of the great act of scarifying. In contemporary
society, only religious revelation had more importance. But Tukaram was
not an ordinary religious poem. He had knowledge of social conditions. Act of
scarifying business was not come out of hit of the moment but it was come out
of continuous thought process. If it was an impractical act then
all the acts by the social reformers would have been impractical acts.
Tukaram’s abhangas were answer to lie
Through films and
discourses in religious function, it was trying to present a false image of
Tukaram in which Tukaram’s Economic Condition was depicting as worse and he was
struggling to get food of two times for his family. Moreover, Mahipati added
his own words to Tukaram’s tongue and claiming that Tukaram accepted the path
of Sanyasi and choose to beg as a source of survival. Everything was a big lie.
Saint Tukaram, on many occasions, has strongly opposed the begging. In his
poem, he said to lord vital that he was not lacking food. He can survive his
family without any help.
नाही दुकालालो अन्ना ! परी या मान जनार्धना!! 608.1
नाही आम्ही खात! काही कोणाचे लागत !! 2133.3
These lines of his poems clearly told us about Tukaram.
There are many poems that support the fact that Tukaram had no worst family
life. It was a misinterpretation by the established class who did not want to
spread Tukaram’s teaching at grassroots because of Tukaram’s rebel against
prevailing rituals and exploitations by Upper-Class people.
One more lie that was disseminated by established contemporary
power was that Tukaram was a coward and weak. Because of his weak nature, he
escaped from family life. It was baseless information. Tukaram, for more than
20 years, fought against casteism, Varna system, strongly criticized the Vedas
and raised voice against an exploitative system imposed by then
brahminical society. How one can say that such a powerful and intellectual man
was weak. It was false information spread by certain people to lower the
importance of Rebellion Saint.
Tukaram had the means of lending which could exploit the common
people, he drowned it himself. His conduct set an example before us
for worldly possessions. Wealth should be acquired for the sake of
the family, but it should not be obtained by deceiving, swindling, or indulging
in unreasonable temptations, he told the people through his
actions. This ideal was not for the ascetics, but for the
householders. Through this act, he became closer to the common
people. They reconciled their joys and sorrows, identifying
steps. He proved that he was not the only a man of thoughts but the
man of action.
To be continued ......................Next Article will throw
lights of his view on Vedas
👍👍👍👌👌👌👌
उत्तर द्याहटवा